Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian.promisekeepers
From: Mike Doughney <m...@mtd.com>
Date: 1997/12/14
Subject: More Rumors??? Re: LA Gang Connections to McCartney
> References: <348B7293.1...@best.com> <9712082125.AA24...@basement-1.mtd.com> <66m6cj$p0...@news1.epix.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.31 under Emacs 19.34.4 On December 10, not_dvdr...@epix.net wrote: > I must be missing something. Mike McCartney does not run Promise The story directly references McCartney. (The link given for the story > Keepers. Bill McCartney runs Promise Keepers. How it has the link > been made between Mike and Bill, or we just assuming because they have > the same last name they are related in some way? doesn't work, you have to go to espn.sportsnet.com and use the 'more features' link at the bottom to get to the gangs feature.) Excerpt: : These days, Bill McCartney is the very public face of the Promise > Mike Doughney <m...@mtd.com> wrote: As my license plate frame says, "I'd rather be living in a democracy." > >Well, as I see it, people who run authoritarian, cell-structured > This seems to be a very tilted selfserving view, IMNTBHO. I don't think that subverting our government, on the basis of a rewrite of history that falsely insists that this nation was founded as a "Christian nation," to one particular Biblical interpretation is a good thing for anyone, including, over the long term, Christianity itself. > In as much And how does this follow from anything that I said? > as the the constitution garentees freedom of religion, any adverse > attack by the government on one religious practice raises or lowers > the bar in defining what is legitimate government control of religion. The constitution guarantees freedom of religion. The issue is not - > That is why I have seen people of widely different beliefs assisting Now, perhaps you should go brush up on how Sun Myung Moon and the > others in the practice of their religion. It is the same as defending > free speach. In as much as the governments inhibiting the political > speach of a discenting idology cannot be done without impacting the > very faberic which defends all our speach. Unification Church have been destroying families for their own ends for decades, and how religious leaders all across the board have condemned the practices of his church, and then come back and tell me why an allegedly good Christian guy like Falwell should accept money from a convicted felon who's been running a religious cult abhorrent to most Christians. You might start with the page at http://www.fom.org/moon. And again, you jump to a bogus appeal to the defense of free speech Mike Doughney You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||